Feature Implementation Request
Context
You are working with a Python codebase for an XML Directory Processor. The project has a comprehensive test suite organized into critical, important, integration, and validation test categories. All existing functionality must remain intact and all tests must continue to pass.
Project Structure
/
├── docs/
│ ├── archive/
│ ├── decisions/
│ └── ideas/
│ ├── README.md
│ ├── TEMPLATE.md
│ └── {FEATURE_SPEC_FILE}
├── LICENSE
├── quick_test_runner.py
├── README.md
├── run_tests.py
├── tests/
│ ├── critical/
│ ├── important/
│ ├── integration/
│ └── validation/
└── xml_directory_processor.py
Current Codebase
[Attach the complete current xml_directory_processor.py file]
Feature Request
I want to implement the feature described in docs/ideas/{FEATURE_SPEC_FILE}.
Requirements
- Backward Compatibility: All existing functionality must work exactly as before
- Test Compatibility: All existing tests must pass without modification
- Code Quality: Maintain the same coding standards and error handling patterns
- Cross-Platform: Ensure Windows compatibility while maintaining cross-platform support
- Risk Mitigation: Implement proper fallback mechanisms for any new functionality
Expected Response Format
If Code Changes Are Required:
Provide the complete, updated xml_directory_processor.py file with:
- Clear comments marking what was changed and why
- Proper error handling and fallback mechanisms
- Maintained backward compatibility
- All existing imports and functionality preserved
If No Code Changes Are Required:
Explain why no changes are needed and provide step-by-step instructions for:
- Environment variable setup (if applicable)
- Configuration file changes (if applicable)
- Command-line usage modifications (if applicable)
- Any other setup requirements
In Both Cases, Also Provide:
- Risk Assessment: What could go wrong and how it's mitigated
- Testing Strategy: How to verify the feature works without breaking existing functionality
- Rollback Plan: How to undo changes if issues arise
- Usage Examples: Command-line examples showing the new feature in action
Success Criteria
- Feature works as specified in the documentation
- All existing tests pass (
python quick_test_runner.pyshould show all green) - No regression in existing functionality
- Proper error handling for edge cases
- Clear user feedback for any configuration requirements
Quality Standards
- Follow the existing code style and patterns
- Use the same error handling approach (logging + graceful degradation)
- Maintain the same level of documentation and comments
- Ensure Windows path handling remains robust
- Preserve all existing command-line arguments and their behavior
Implementation Note: Focus on minimal, surgical changes that add the new functionality without disrupting the existing, well-tested codebase. When in doubt, prefer configuration-based solutions over code modifications.